Big Question
Whether an exposition on a telephonic conversation in an audio lead mandates investigation morally? And what denies the common man to question him over this? We have this in our constitution. At least he should come and offer an explanation. Social media/Conventional Media should raise this as a quandary over this and ask him to clarify his position regarding these disturbing audio leaks.
It is not necessarily the case that an exposition of a telephonic conversation in audio necessarily mandates an investigation from a moral perspective. Whether an investigation is warranted would depend on the content of the conversation and the context in which it took place. If the conversation reveals misconduct or wrongdoing on the part of the public office holder, then it could be considered a matter of public concern and an investigation may be morally justified.
Khan's audio leaks
— Zorays Khalid (@zorayskhalid) December 20, 2022
However, if the conversation is a purely personal matter and does not involve any wrongdoing, then an investigation may not be justified from a moral perspective. It is important to consider the privacy rights of individuals and to ensure that any investigation is conducted in a fair and transparent manner. My suggestion is to ask him, not accuse him. Should he give a statement too and send a video for forensics?
Is Khan a Hypocrite?
Of course, he is. But when you condone one person leaked audio then somebody else’s may be leaked too. We all know who records and who leaks and that’s not politicians. We must strongly condemn it. The highest public office holder, he’s answerable for his actions, both in/out of office. But the audio leak is much earlier than even he had the KP govt. The audio was not in 2013, he wasn’t a public office holder when this audio is purportedly from – again it’s a private convo between consenting adults. Being a public office holder doesn’t mean you leak their private info.
