The no-confidence motion must not have been accepted while the forged letter was with the Govt on the 7th of March which allegedly lead the deputy speaker who was just there to preside but pass a ruling at the behest of the speaker (against whom there was already a no-confidence) while reading a predesigned ruling within two minutes and that letter read Asad Qaiser.
No debate no nothing and declared combined opposition disloyal to the state. A 197 majority composed 68% of the total national assembly seats. Whereas, in the hearing of self filed Presidential reference, the Attorney general had categorically discounted any chances of not giving the right of vote to the members of the National Assembly.
Soon after that, Mr. Imran Khan went on to address the Nation within 15 minutes urging the President to dissolve “assemblies” where he meant National Assembly only. This is in violation of the constitution as without the result of the No-Confidence move, PM could not dissolve the assembly.
The deputy speaker’s ruling is blatantly unconstitutional as he was just presiding and had limited authority to exercise with the session in progress. There upon, Imran Khan has no authority to advise the President to dissolve the National Assembly Dissolving the assembly on the advice of a person who has no authority to do so has no constitutional basis.
Imran Khan forged the Letter/Cable which he is using to allege opposition of treason. Will Imran Khan respond a very simple question? If US threatened you on March 7th through a Pakistani diplomat then why did you invite US Under Secretary of State in OIC conference in Islamabad on March 21st?
