Connect with Zorays

Hi, what are you looking for?

Sports

Imran Khan and The Self Boosted Ego

Imran Khan Cricketer
Facebook Twitter/X LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp

Imran Khan said he will continue to fight till the end whereas he was looking for hideouts to implement 63-1/a upfront up until he destroyed the constitution. Even on the day of the vote count, the deputy speaker Qasim Suri (who for the past 6 months is hiding behind a stay order for a vote recount) enforced article 5. Imran Khan reminds me of the kid who when refused another turn to bat, would take his bat and ball with him so nobody else can play either.

The no-confidence motion must not have been accepted while the forged letter was with the Govt on the 7th of March which allegedly lead the deputy speaker who was just there to preside but pass a ruling at the behest of the speaker (against whom there was already a no-confidence) while reading a predesigned ruling within two minutes and that letter read Asad Qaiser.

No debate no nothing and declared combined opposition disloyal to the state. A 197 majority composed 68% of the total national assembly seats. Whereas, in the hearing of self filed Presidential reference, the Attorney general had categorically discounted any chances of not giving the right of vote to the members of the National Assembly.

Soon after that, Mr. Imran Khan went on to address the Nation within 15 minutes urging the President to dissolve “assemblies” where he meant National Assembly only. This is in violation of the constitution as without the result of the No-Confidence move, PM could not dissolve the assembly.

The deputy speaker’s ruling is blatantly unconstitutional as he was just presiding and had limited authority to exercise with the session in progress. There upon, Imran Khan has no authority to advise the President to dissolve the National Assembly Dissolving the assembly on the advice of a person who has no authority to do so has no constitutional basis.

Imran Khan forged the Letter/Cable which he is using to allege opposition of treason. Will Imran Khan respond a very simple question? If US threatened you on March 7th through a Pakistani diplomat then why did you invite US Under Secretary of State in OIC conference in Islamabad on March 21st?

Tabdeeli Not Found

This is not a tactical win-lose situation, it is a strategic crises that has put our constitutional framework at stake. This is beyond politics now. To all my PTI friends who are happy with subjugation of vote of no confidence, this is severe subversion of the constitution. Deputy speaker Qasim Suri rejected no-confidence move under article 5 and after that. For the first time we are witnessing that a political party workers are congratulating each other after bringing down their own government! What limited mindset! Phew.

Facebook Twitter/X LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

World Affairs

Pakistan and India trade blame after a naval collision near Oman as recycled footage, disputed damage claims and treaty questions flood social media.

Technology & AI

Pakistan’s D-248, S-369, Nimbus2K and HiMark-25 challenge India’s drone ambitions—but displayed models and flight tests demand different conclusions.

Economy & Markets

Why the “Straits Taylor Rule” went viral, what it gets right about oil shocks, and why Pakistan cannot interest-rate-hike energy insecurity.

Energy & Environment

A proposed US diesel export ban exposes Britain’s reliance on imported fuel. Here is what the refinery data show and why Pakistan should pay...

World Affairs

Flydubai’s reported Tabuk landing raises questions about emergency codes, conflicting fight claims, Pakistan’s Saudi ties and Israeli military airspace access.

Technology & AI

Bilal Bin Saqib’s photo with Sam Altman sparked claims of an AI breakthrough. Pakistan deserves the meeting record, concrete commitments and a credible energy...

Politics & Governance

Pakistan permits smartphone tax instalments through DIRBS, but the total liability remains. Here is what changed—and what remains unresolved.

Advertisement