What People Are Reading Into (Signals, Not Proof)
Much of the speculation stems from observable but non-evidentiary actions:
-
Sannia Ashfaq removed photos with Imad from Instagram
-
She unfollowed him and changed her bio
-
She posted an emotionally charged caption about pregnancy and strength
These actions signal pain, not guilt.
They communicate distress, not causation.
In law, journalism, and ethics, this distinction matters.
The London Video and a Third Name Dragged In
Fuel was added to the fire when a video circulated showing Imad Wasim in London with influencer Nyla Raja.
The response from Nyla Raja was immediate and public:
-
The interaction was not hidden
-
The video was taken in a public place
-
The framing selectively zoomed to manufacture implication
-
She rejected being dragged into a private marital matter
No evidence has emerged that contradicts her account.
At present, the allegation rests entirely on association + timing + imagination — a formula social media often mistakes for truth.
The Public Reaction: Outrage Before Evidence
Online reactions have been fierce, emotional, and often absolute.
Some posts condemn Imad Wasim as morally irredeemable.
Others ask a simpler question:
