-
Publicly dedicating victories to Bangladesh.
-
Formal statements recorded with the ICC.
-
Coordinated diplomatic messaging alongside on-field participation.
Implications for PCB
-
Zero risk of sanctions.
-
Retains revenue, exposure, and sporting continuity.
-
Positions Pakistan as a principled participant rather than a disruptor.
-
May disappoint domestic audiences seeking visible confrontation.
Implications for ICC
-
No immediate revenue loss.
-
But sustained reputational pressure.
-
Governance scrutiny continues without a commercial shock absorber.
-
The Bangladesh precedent remains unresolved, keeping the issue alive across cycles.
This option sacrifices leverage for legitimacy—but preserves long-term institutional relationships.
Read from the Past: Jay Shah and BCCI’s Fragile Ego
What the ICC Can—and Cannot—Do
A critical clarification is necessary.
The International Cricket Council:
-
Does not issue NOCs to players.
-
Does sanction tournaments. An unsanctioned tournament cannot receive NOCs from member boards.
In theory, the ICC could attempt to unsanction the Pakistan Super League, which would isolate it internationally. In practice, this is an extreme measure, historically reserved for corruption or governance collapse—not political withdrawals tied to government advice.
Similarly:
