The principle of compulsion will NOT hold if a person VIOLATES majority’s RIGHTS (Rights to Honour, Property, Freedom), in that case, the AUTHORITIES will COMPEL that person to make amends/repay/or suffer similar pain. Similarly, taxes (which are received from the rich and spent upon the poor). In all these cases, the injunction of the Quran will supervene the Principle of NO COMPULSION, for obvious reasons.)
No compulsion means no restriction on anyone’s beliefs. One can belong to any school of thought having equal basic human rights. But having an opinion opposing to a specific school of thought and then asking to be called a part of them is totally different, it’s like making and accepting Newton’s fourth law of motion. It doesn’t mean you can go around allowing non-muslims (Ahmedis in this case, who do not believe in the finality of the prophet (saw)) with their non-Islamic practices declare that they are Muslims and they represent real Islam.
Do you know, Ahmadis make false visas and hide their identities while going to Ka’aba Tullah are usually cause of menaces such as harassment and begging in the name of Islam. Today, those who are found on Twitter exploiting the religion are to no short of liberal hypocrisy and exaggeration from their inward bias.
That is harming Islam and measures have to be taken against it. Allama Iqbal has categorically said that anyone who claims to be part of the Muslim community and even regards a Prophet of its own besides the Prophet PBUH, and labels all Muslims besides themselves as non-Muslims and disbelievers, such a person or group must be declared a non-muslim minority and be cut off from the Muslim diaspora. ( Zinda-Rood by Javed Iqbal )
The question is did Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) declare anyone who recited a kalima, a kafir?
