5. FATF Exit: Compliance, Not Cosmetics
The Financial Action Task Force does not operate on sentiment.
Pakistan’s removal from the FATF grey list in 2022 followed:
-
Criminalization of terror financing
-
Convictions under AML/CFT laws
-
Asset seizures and banking restrictions
-
Legal action against the very groups now cited as “state-backed”
FATF compliance is evidence-driven and consensus-based. Political sympathy does not remove countries from enhanced monitoring—compliance does.
6. Gaza and the Irony of Accusation
Perhaps the most revealing contradiction lies in Gaza.
Pakistan has been formally discussed as a potential stabilizing or peace-support contributor in post-conflict Gaza frameworks—an idea publicly acknowledged in U.S. policy discourse, including references by Marco Rubio.
States accused of sponsoring terror are not simultaneously considered for peacekeeping or stabilization roles in one of the world’s most scrutinized conflict zones.
7. The Pattern Behind the Pattern
What emerges is a clear asymmetry:
-
Allegations rely on unnamed intelligence leaks, social-media amplification, and recycled assumptions
-
Pakistan’s record consists of bans, arrests, FATF compliance, UN listings, diplomatic restraint, and peacekeeping credentials
Conflating non-state actors, legacy groups, and individual movements with state policy is analytically lazy—and strategically misleading.
