Adil Raja, prove it: a documentation-first challenge (not vibes, not hysteria)

• Publicly apologise,

• Pay approximately £310,000 in damages and legal costs, and

• Comply with an injunction prohibiting repetition of the defamatory claims.

This is not a matter of opinion. It is a matter of record.

So here is the challenge.

If you are telling the world you are a whistleblower under attack, then act like one.

Whistleblowers document. They don’t just broadcast.

1) What is verified — and what is not

Verified: UK court outcome (defamation)

Multiple mainstream outlets report that the UK High Court ordered Raja to pay damages and costs and to publish a court-mandated apology/summary for a defined period. While headlines vary slightly, the existence of the order, the injunction, and the monetary penalty are consistent across sources.

This establishes one hard fact:

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.