Adil Raja, prove it: a documentation-first challenge (not vibes, not hysteria)

Reported but not yet publicly documented: Fourth Schedule designation

Reports state that Raja has been placed on the Fourth Schedule / proscribed persons framework under the Anti-Terrorism Act. While the claim is widely circulated and attributed to official summaries, a publicly accessible notification has not yet been produced.

Until it is, the designation should be treated as reported, not conclusively proven—a standard that cuts both ways.

2) What Fourth Schedule placement implies — and why scrutiny is required

Pakistan’s anti-terror framework allows the state to impose monitoring, financial restrictions, and movement controls on individuals deemed a security risk. These powers are serious and far-reaching.

At the same time, credible journalism has repeatedly warned that such measures can be misused to pressure dissent if not backed by transparent evidence.

Both realities can coexist:

• The state may claim it is countering harmful activity, and

• The public still has the right to demand clear, testable proof.

That is the standard being applied to the state.
It is also the standard being applied to Adil Raja.

3) The “home raid / intimidation” narrative: what evidence looks like

Raja has claimed on X that his home was targeted and that UK police responded.

If someone alleges state-linked intimidation abroad, the evidentiary bar is not mysterious. It is basic:

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

At minimum, publish (with redactions where necessary):

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5