Connect with Zorays

Hi, what are you looking for?

Economy & Markets

You Cannot 25-Basis-Point a Chokepoint: The Brutal Economic Truth Behind the “Straits Taylor Rule”

Why the “Straits Taylor Rule” went viral, what it gets right about oil shocks, and why Pakistan cannot interest-rate-hike energy insecurity.

You Cannot 25-Basis-Point a Chokepoint: The Brutal Economic Truth Behind the “Straits Taylor Rule”

The Federal Reserve can raise the price of money, but it cannot print crude oil, command a tanker through hostile waters or manufacture a shipping corridor out of a press conference. That is the uncomfortable truth behind the “Straits Taylor Rule,” the equation posted by Iranian parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf’s account as Washington confronted inflation linked to an energy shock. The formula looked like graduate macroeconomics colliding with geopolitical trolling, but beneath the theatre sat a serious question: what happens when the world’s most powerful central bank confronts inflation created not by excessive shopping, reckless credit or an overheating labour market, but by a physical interruption in the movement of energy?

The post rewrote the familiar Taylor Rule as:

i=r+π+1.5(ππ)+0.5(yy)+α(SOHSOH)+β(BEMBEM)

Here, SOHSOH represents the Strait of Hormuz and BEMBEM represents Bab el-Mandeb. The additions were not presented as a peer-reviewed monetary-policy model. They were satire with mathematical notation: a way of telling Washington that the inflation rate appearing on its screens may now be carrying a geopolitical surcharge that no quarter-point interest-rate increase can physically remove.

The line that detonated across social media was simpler than the equation: “You can’t 25bp a chokepoint.” Technically, that claim is both clever and incomplete. A rate increase cannot reopen a strait or create a barrel, but monetary policy can still influence how an initial energy shock spreads through wages, contracts, credit, asset prices and inflation expectations. The real mistake is therefore not raising rates. The mistake is pretending that raising rates solves the original supply failure.

READ:   Kashmir Banay Ga Pakistan in light of Indo-Pak War 1965 Short note

What the Original Taylor Rule Actually Says

Economist John Taylor’s influential rule was designed as a systematic way of thinking about how a central bank might adjust its nominal policy rate when inflation deviates from target or economic output moves away from its sustainable level. In simplified terms, the policy rate rises when inflation is too high or the economy is running too hot, and falls when inflation is weak or economic activity is depressed.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

World Affairs

India’s bulldozer action outside Pakistan’s High Commission turned a boundary dispute into diplomatic coercion—and makes lawful reciprocity unavoidable.

World Affairs

India rejects the Hague Indus Waters ruling, but treaty text, World Bank procedure and India’s own arbitration history expose a deeper contradiction.

World Affairs

Modi’s extraordinary Delhi-Tashkent detour exposes what maps cannot hide: Pakistan’s airspace remains strategically expensive for India to bypass.

World Affairs

Sergio Gor called Kashmir part of India. Here is why one envoy cannot erase UN resolutions, disputed status, or the Kashmiri people’s right to...

Technology & AI

Pakistan’s D-248, S-369, Nimbus2K and HiMark-25 challenge India’s drone ambitions—but displayed models and flight tests demand different conclusions.

World Affairs

Abhinandan Varthaman joins FLY91 as the disputed 2019 F-16 claim collides again with US aircraft counts, recovered missiles and the public record.

World Affairs

Pakistan and India trade blame after a naval collision near Oman as recycled footage, disputed damage claims and treaty questions flood social media.

Advertisement