Perhaps anyone can learn to be an improved version of themselves, but there is defiantly a genetic element to leadership. If you don’t believe us, spend some time on a playground with 2 year old. There is always one or two children that rise to the occasion. Few politicians believe that some leadership traits are inherited to their offspring, this seems true only because of the exposure of a child in a political arena. In a daily basis she encounters with many people who are active in politics, this can lead to have some effects and drag a person like Maryam Nawaz in politics.
Is the gene Dominant or is it Recessive?
Leadership is not genetics but some others traits related to it, they are. Thoughtful leadership it is neither taught nor inherited, leadership is a unique timing of three forces, 1) a man’s inherited/acquired traits, 2) his surrounding situation and 3) his impelling reason to act inline or against surrounding situation. Ever wondered why a criminal becomes a criminal? Most of the time, not because he had a predisposition, but driven by (negative) influences which eventually made him a criminal. Some people have a tendency to show criminal behaviour or have a predisposition to do certain criminal things. However, much can be reduced by creating solid social structures to prevent these corrupt behaviours.
There is nothing like leadership gene. Better we not bring in the politics here. Democracy fails when people make the leader as an Autocrat due to unwanted favoritism. We all have certain pre-dispositions to behave in a certain way. That means some people have a predisposition to lead instead of follow (dominate or being submissive). However, leadership is more than that. It is a continuously process to improve your skill set. Having a pre-disposition (leadership gen) is not enough.
