Connect with Zorays

Hi, what are you looking for?

Politics & Governance

London’s Singh’s Dining saga reveals Indian‑backed anti‑Pakistani smear campaign

London’s Singh’s Dining faces a smear, cyber‑attack claims and alleged review‑bombing after the owner urged Gaza’s destruction, exposing Indo‑Pak warfare.

Editorial montage: Nighttime London skyline with a flickering Indian restaurant sign, a waving Pakistani flag, a red "FAFO" stamp, and a man in a red turban standing nearby, all rendered in photorealistic style, lower area empty

When Harman Singh Kapoor, the owner of Singh’s Dining in Fulham, posted a video urging Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to “destroy every house in Gaza,” the post ignited a cascade of online attacks that quickly moved beyond political debate into a coordinated campaign targeting his business. Within hours, the restaurant was labelled a “SHUTDOWN” target by a wave of retweets, while Kapoor simultaneously posted messages insisting the venue remained open and pleading for walk‑ins. The clash of narratives—shutdown rumors, alleged cyber‑attacks, and a flood of one‑star Google reviews—has exposed a broader pattern of Indian‑aligned digital operatives weaponising cancel culture against a Pakistani‑born entrepreneur in the United Kingdom.

Self‑portrait of Harman Singh Kapoor wearing a red turban and white patterned shirt, seated inside a vehicle interior
Selfie posted by Kapoor on X, illustrating his appearance at the time of the video

What is happening on the ground

Kapoor’s own statements provide the only direct evidence of the restaurant’s operational status. In a tweet dated 13 October, he wrote, “WE ARE OPEN! Please walk‑in… To make bookings, message ONLY on 07424 911245. Please DO NOT CALL.” The same post also claimed his website had been “hit by a cyber attack and has crashed,” leaving customers unable to book online. A screenshot posted later that night showed a 404 “DEPLOYMENT_NOT_FOUND” page for the site, contradicting his claim that the site was back up within minutes. The inconsistency between the owner’s assertions and the technical evidence suggests either a genuine technical failure or a PR narrative designed to elicit sympathy.

Parallel to the technical dispute, a separate line of attack focused on the restaurant’s reputation on Google. Several users alleged a “review bomb” of fake one‑star ratings, yet a community‑note‑verified post confirmed that only eighteen reviews existed across all rating categories. The same post also noted that the claim of a coordinated Google conspiracy was unsupported. By contrast, a Google‑Maps screenshot taken on 13 October listed the venue as “Permanently closed” with a 3.8‑star rating and roughly one thousand reviews, directly opposing Kapoor’s insistence that the restaurant remained open for customers.

READ:  Junaid Hafeez, Section 295-C and the Rule of Law: Reconsideration or Safe Passage?
Google Maps business listing screenshot showing an Indian restaurant named Rangrez with a 3.8‑star rating, 1,010 reviews and a red oval highlighting the label 'Permanently closed'
Google Maps screenshot captured on 13 October indicating the venue was listed as permanently closed, contrary to the owner’s claim of remaining open
Claim Source Verified fact
Restaurant is open and taking walk‑ins Owner’s tweet (13 Oct) Google‑Maps shows “Permanently closed” as of 13 Oct
Website crashed due to cyber‑attack Owner’s tweet (13 Oct) 404 screenshot confirms site unavailable; no technical proof of attack
Review‑bombing with fake one‑star reviews Multiple user claims (13 Oct) Only 18 reviews visible; community note calls bomb claim unsupported

These three data points illustrate the core contradictions that have fueled the online firestorm: a claim of operational continuity, an alleged cyber‑attack, and an accusation of review‑bombing, each of which is either directly refuted by independent screenshots or left unsubstantiated.

The Pakistani insight

From a Pakistani perspective, the episode mirrors a familiar playbook used against diaspora businesses that voice pro‑Palestinian sentiment. The language that proliferated—”FAFO,” “Karma,” and the slur “Londonistan”—echoes meme‑driven harassment campaigns previously observed against Pakistani journalists and activists. The owner’s original video targeted Netanyahu, a figure widely condemned in Pakistan for his role in the Gaza conflict; rather than generating solidarity, the video became a pretext for a coordinated smear that leveraged both nationalist anger and commercial rivalry.

Pages: 1 2 3

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Sports

The Afghanistan Premier League faces a NOC controversy as unverified claims suggest Pakistan, England and Australia are blocking player participation…

Opinions

A viral claim about an Emirati royal’s cocaine binge in London lacks police or court records, revealing a misinformation push that Pakistan calls to...

Opinions

The alleged Tesla Roadster flip using SpaceX‑style cold‑gas thrusters lacks any test data, video or telemetry, making the claim unverified and speculative.

Technology & AI

Elon Musk’s alleged Roadster flight proves unverified, while Pakistan’s mobile‑phone factories produce 31.4 million units, showing real tech progress.

Sports

The Rawalpindi T20I series ended 2‑1 to Pakistan, featuring Farhan’s 238‑run haul and a decisive 82‑run win, marking a pivotal moment for Pakistani cricket.

World Affairs

A viral glitch during Barbera Thornhill’s speech sparked memes, exposing how the U.S. masks geopolitical aims while Pakistan endures Western double‑talk.

Sports

India’s shaky 2036 Olympic bid fuels online racism, exposing governance flaws, while Pakistan’s steady sports development offers a stark, progressive contrast.

Advertisement