On October 19, a post on X claimed that a 15‑year‑old orphan named Waseem Abbas was deliberately run over by contractor Tauqeer Nazir in a private housing society of Multan. The same post insisted that lawyers beat the contractor in court and that CCTV footage proved a chase. The story reads like a thriller, yet every cornerstone of the narrative rests on a single, unattributed social‑media thread. When the dust settles, the only solid evidence is a series of low‑resolution screenshots and a 2021‑dated camera frame that predates the alleged incident by five years.
What the Posts Assert
The original X post by @HalfManHalfRusk wrote, “Contractor Chases and Crushes 15‑Year‑Old Apprentice to Death with Car in Multan… around October 19.” It named the driver, Tauqeer Nazir, and identified the victim as orphan Waseem Abbas. Follow‑up posts by @RaadulPakistan and @AndiMiOfficial added that police handed the contractor over to a mob of lawyers who “thrashed” him during a court appearance. A graphic from the outlet THE CURRENT, overlaid with the caption “Lawyers thrash man who ran over kid in Multan 🚨,” was shared as visual proof of the beating.
Why the Evidence Crumbles
Every claim above is an attributed allegation. No police report, reputable newspaper, or court transcript has been produced. The visual material consists of three images that do not identify any of the parties involved. The first shows a white car with red stains on a driveway; the second is a grainy security‑camera still of a dark‑coloured vehicle and a nearby motorcycle; the third is a crowd of men in suits, one wearing a red‑patterned prayer cap. None of these pictures carry metadata linking them to the alleged October 2026 incident. Most damning of all, a screenshot labelled “Canera 02” bears the timestamp “10‑19‑2021 Mon 19:31:22,” three years before the story’s claimed date, suggesting the footage was either mis‑dated or deliberately repurposed.
In short, the core factual claim – that a contractor chased and killed an orphan on October 19 2026 – rests solely on user‑generated posts. The alleged CCTV footage is never linked, and the graphic from THE CURRENT is a meme‑style overlay, not primary evidence. No retrieved‑source‑supported documentation exists for any of the central assertions.
